Dearest HATER and Shadi

Thank you. That is all.


STALIN, YOU SAID THEY HAD EXPERIENCE AND SHIT.

DA wrote:STALIN, YOU SAID THEY HAD EXPERIENCE AND SHIT.

That's why they don't need to read the rules.

MrNaleIt wrote:

DA wrote:STALIN, YOU SAID THEY HAD EXPERIENCE AND SHIT.

That's why they don't need to read the rules.

I'll just hope you're being sarcastic.

Anyway a real dramafest has been going on tonight. Or at least more than usual. Anger and frustration seem to be contagious so I'm just gonna lie here reminding you it's just a game.

Not including mafia games, I would personally like to add that I get the impression some of you are acting more xenophobic than you need to be. Lighten up a bit, it'll save you some arbitrary troubles.

Alpar wrote:so I'm just gonna lie here reminding you it's just a game.

And then there is this faget.

2. Last Words Clause.
You are allowed only one post after you die or are replaced. This post may not contain any information or speculation regarding the game.

8. Dead men tell no tales.
Dead players are DEAD. They can't talk about mafia and live players can't interrogate them, either ingame or outgame until the game is over.

13. Don't break rules 1, 2, 7, 8 or 12.
A violation of the aforementioned rules is grounds for immediate removal from the current game, and the next game as well. He will also not be able to host the next game, so BEHAVE.

14. 2 strikes clause.
Disobeying 2 rules in a single game will ban you for the next game. This does not overlap with Rule #13.

So, whoever's hosting the next game has the power to restrict Hater and Shadi access from their next game

For Barney the Dinosaur's sake, I just asked for one simple thing...

Stalin broke 'em too by yelling after his death that Nale and Cloak were mafia.

Doubly funny since they weren't.

True I was annoyed and tired at the time.
I've been Barney the Dinosaur up latley.

I broke the part about posting more than once, guilty as charged. However I feel like questioning the rest.

As for both rule 2 and 8 (the rules I "violated".) All the players I talked about were dead and therefore their roles confirmed (HATER and Rainboy), if you honestly see harm in that it's a bit surprising. Anyway I'm not here to argue or cause any harm, however, I'll let you know that I didn't mean any evil intention by making those posts.

Also, yes, we do have experience nor did we lie to Stalin; rules are not the same everywhere.

I was excited about joining round 47, but seems like there could be doubt whether I'm allowed in or not; I'll take on the punishment if you really feel like it's necessary to hand out. Although, the correct way to moderate as I obviously didn't mean any harm would to just tell me not to do it in the next game.

Also this could be easily dealt with by sending me and HATER a pm and/or the next guy in the hosting line beforehand. The public exposure was for?

Edit:
Last but not least, I stopped after Mentle poked me about the 1 post rule; so it puzzles me why it wasn't left there. True, I should have read up the rules but this is a bit over the top to do.

Multiple posts after death isn't really a serious problem, and talking to dead people isn't against the rules. I doubt you'd be banned from even a single round and you don't even really need a warning.

Hater broke a serious rule though, regardless if I was mafia or not. Right after the update to the final day he posted "Hey Ment, thanks for reminding me I can't call out mafias after death!". Since everyone was online and discussing the situation with me as one of the main suspects, it was dangerous as anyone paying more attention would understand the message.

He said he didn't know I was mafia, I find that really hard to believe since I killed him right before he could vote against Gamage (should be clear to him that both me and Gamage were mafia), that was the very reason I reminded Hater he couldn't accuse anyone after death. I will try to believe him, so I think there shouldn't be a harsh punishment, one game out is more than enough.

So this wasn't so much me or what? I'm a bit confused now.

Shadi wrote:So this wasn't so much me or what? I'm a bit confused now.

Nothing you did was serious or not done before, yeah. DA included your name because you are new to the forums and might not have read the rules, I think.

Mentle wrote:Nothing you did was serious or not done before, yeah. DA included your name because you are new to the forums and might not have read the rules, I think.

What Mentle said

Okay thanks, breaking rules and having a bad reputation is the last thing I want to happen >_<..

Good night (8 am here haha).

Alpar wrote:

MrNaleIt wrote:

DA wrote:STALIN, YOU SAID THEY HAD EXPERIENCE AND SHIT.

That's why they don't need to read the rules.

I'll just hope you're being sarcastic.

Anyway a real dramafest has been going on tonight. Or at least more than usual. Anger and frustration seem to be contagious so I'm just gonna lie here reminding you it's just a game.

Not including mafia games, I would personally like to add that I get the impression some of you are acting more xenophobic than you need to be. Lighten up a bit, it'll save you some arbitrary troubles.

Tbh I'm with Alps on this one. This douchebaggery really ain't appealing to me.

Actually, I was referring to something else that happened the other night. Just something regarding our behavior towards new people (DA in particular.)

If they broke the rules then it's up to the mods to deliver a fair sentence for it. A ban from a game or two should be just fine.

Alpar wrote:Actually, I was referring to something else that happened the other night. Just something regarding our behavior towards new people (DA in particular.)

If they broke the rules then it's up to the mods to deliver a fair sentence for it. A ban from a game or two should be just fine.

I was referring to what happened the other night in fact.

French Connections wrote:I was referring to what happened the other night in fact.

Tally ho. Jolly times.